1. 近幾年中小企業融資失敗的案例有哪些
你要找什麼類型的例子,絕大多數創業公司都是在中小階段失敗了的,恩美路演上有大把各種案例可以看
2. 互聯網金融對中小企業融資的影響有哪些
互聯網金融對我國中小企業的影響
互聯網金融依靠互聯網提供金融服務,與傳統融資方式有本質區別。在傳統融資模式下,在中小企業的發展過程中,內外部原因使得融資道路困難重重,而互聯網金融的出現在一定程度上解決了小企業融資難問題。互聯網金融使得傳統金融業務更加透明,企業參與度更高,合作更協調,操作便捷並有效較低成本。
1.解決信息不對稱問題
商業銀行可以通過在網路上公開的交易金額和交易記錄信息掌控中小企業的最新經營狀況,並對不同評級不同規模的企業給予不同的授信額度和不同的貸款利率。信息公開化不僅緩解了中小企業融資難的問題,也使得商業銀行能更加大膽的投入資金到中小企業發展中去。
2.有效降低貸款成本
與傳統金融相比,互聯網金融自動化的服務平台使商業銀行可以直接查找企業借貸的真實數據和財務狀況,不需要花費成本到企業調查和實地調研,也不需要花費時間來追蹤企業的經營狀況,無形之中這就降低了借貸成本,同時也提高了企業融資效率。
3.緩解擔保不足問題
在傳統資金融資中,中小企業往往因為沒有足夠的資產進行抵押而被限制貸款,互聯網金融的出現改變了受擔保局限的問題。企業不需要任何抵押或者擔保,通過和各個商務平台上各個企業合作形成網路聯保貸款,以集體名義向商業銀行借款,各個企業共同承擔風險。
3. 求有關互聯網金融對中小企業融資的影響的外文文獻,三篇!
研究中小企業融資要參考的英文文獻
英文圖書和期刊類文獻:
[1]Allen N.Berger,Gregory F.Udell,「Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in
Small FirmFinance,」Journal of Business,Vol.68,no.3.(1995),pp.351-381.
[2]Aghion,P.,Incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting,Review of
Economics Studies,1992,Vol.59,p473-494.
[3]Albertode,M.&JulioPindado.Determinants of capital structure:new evidence
from Spanish Panel data[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2001,(7):77-99.
[4]A.N.Berger,N.H.Miller,M.A.Petersen,R.G.Rajan,J.C.Stein,2001,「Does
Function Follow Organizational Form?Evidence from the Lending Practices of
Large and Small Banks」,Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System
Working Paper.
[5]Azam,J.P.,B.Biais,M.Dia and C.Mauriel.Informal and Formal Credit Markets
and Credit Rationing in Cote D』Ivoire,Oxford Review of Economic Policy,
2001,17(4),520-532.
[6]Bernanke,B.S.,M.Gerler.Inside the Black Box:The Credit Channel of
Monetary Policy Transmission[J].Journal of Economic
Perspectives,1995,(9);27-48.
[7]Barbosa,E.&Moraes,C.,Determinants of the Firm』s Capital Structure:the
Case of the Very Small Enterprises,Working Paper from Econpapers,2003,
366-358。
[8]Barton,S.L.&Gordon,P.J.Corporate strategy and capital structure[J].
Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:623-632.
[9]Baxter,N.D.&Cragg,J.G.Corporate choice among long-term financing
instruments[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,1970,(52):225-235.
[10]Berger,A.N.,Udell,G.F.,RelationshipLending andLinesof Credit in Small
Firm Finance[J],Journal ofBusiness,1995,68,351—382.
[11]Berger,A.N.,Udell,and G.F.The Economics of Small Business Finance:
The Roles of Private Equity and Debts Markets in the Financial Growth
Cycle[J].Journal of Banking and Finance,1998,22(6):613-673.137
[12]Berger and Udell,Small Business Credit Availability and Relationship
Lending:The Importance of Bank Organizational Structure[J],Economic
Journal,2002,112(447)L:32-53.
[13]Booth,Laurence,Varouj Aivazian,Asli Demirguckunt&Vojislav Maksimovie.
Capital structures in developing countries[J].Journal of Finance,2001,
(56):87-130.
[14]Bradley,M.,Jarrell,G.A.,&Kim,E.H.On the existence of an optimal capital
structure:theory and evidence[J].Journal of Finance,1984,(39):857-880.
[15]Brander,J.A.&Lewis,T.R.Oligopoly and financial structure:the limited
liability effect[J].American Economic Review,1986,(76):956-970.
[16]Chang Chun.Capital structure as optimal contract[J].North American Journal
of Economics and Finance,1999,(10):363-385.
[17]Cole,R·A·,Goldberg,L·G·&White,L·J·Cookie-cutter versus character:The
micro structure of small business lending by large and small banks[J]·Journal
of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2004,39,pp227-251.
[18]Collins,J.M.&Sekely,W.S.The relationship of headquarters country and
instry classification to financial structure[J].Financial Management,1983,
(3):45-51.
[19]David F.Scott,John D.Martin.Instry Influence on Financial Structure[J].
Financila Management,Spring,1975,67-73.
[20]DeAngelo,H.&Masulis,R.Optimal capital structure in corporate and Personal
Taxation.Journal of Financial Economics,1980,(8):3-29.
[21]Durand,David,1952,Cost of Debt and Equity Funds for Business:Trends and
Problems of Measurement,Conference on Research in Business Finance,
National Bureau of Economic Research,New York,p215-247.
[22]Eli Schwartz and J Richard Aronson.1967.Some Surrogate Evidence in
Support of the Concept of Optimal Financial Structure[J].Journal of Finance.
22(1):10-18.
[23]Enunza,VR.Determinants of financial structure in the central American
common market[J].Financial Management,1979,(3):72-77.
[24]Fama,E.&Jensen,M.C.Ageney Problem and resial claims.Journal of Law
and Economics,1983,(26):327-349.
[25]Frank M.Z.,GoyalV.K.Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure.138
Journal of Financial Economics,67:217-248,2003.
[26]Gilson,S.Tansaction cost and capital structure choice:evidences from
financially distressed firms[J].Journal of finance,1997,(52):161-195.
[27]Grossman,S.&Hart,O.Corporate financial structure and managerial in
incentives[J].In McCall,J.Ed.The economic of information uncertainty[M].
Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1982:107-137.
[28]Hall,G.,Hutchinson,P.&Michaelas,N.Instry effects on the determinants
of unquoted SMEs』capital structure[J].International Journal of the Economics
of Business,2000,(7):297-312.
[29]Harris,M.&Raviv,A.The theory of capital structure[J].Journal of Finance,
1991,(46):297-355.
[30]Jensen,M.&Meckling,W.Theory of the firm:managerial behavior,agency
cost and capital structure[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1976,
3(l):305-360.
[31]Jordan,J.,Lowe,J.&Taylor,P.Strategy and financial policy in UK small firms
[J].Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,1998,(25):1-27.
[32]Jose Lopez-Gracia&Cristina Aybar-Arias.An empirical approach to the
financial behavior of small and medium sized companies[J].Small Business
Economics,2000,14(l):55-63.
[33]Kane,A.,Marcus,A.J.&McDonald,R.L.How big is the tax advantage to
debt[J].Journal of Finance,1984,(39):841-853.
[34]Kester C W.Capital and ownership structure:A comparison of United States
and Japanese manufacturing corporations[J].FinancialManagement,1986(15):
5-16.
[35]Kim W S,Sorensen E H.Evidence on the impact of the agency costs of debt in
corporate debt policy[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1986,
21:131-144.
[36]Lee Remmers.Instry and Size as Debt Ratio Determinants in Manufacturing
Internationally[J].Financial Management,summer.,2002(5),67-78.
[37]Long,M.&Maltiz,L.The investment-financing nexus:some empirical
evidence[J].Midland Corporate Finance Journal,1985,(3):53-59.
[38]Marsh,P.The choice between equity and debt:an empirical study[J].Journal of
Finance,1982,(37):121-144.139
[39]Mcmillan,J.,Woodruff,C.Interfirm Relationships and Informal Credit in
Vietnam[J].Quaterly Journal of Economics,1999,114(4):1285-1320.
[40]Mian,S.,and C.W...Smith.Accounts Receivable Management Policy:Theory
and Evidence,Journal of Finance,1992,47:169-200.
[41]Ming fang Li&Roy L.S.Environmental dynamism,capital structure and
innovation:an empirical test[J].The International Journal of Organizational
Analysis,2002,(10):169-179.
[42]Modigliani,F.&Miller,M.H.The cost of capital,corporation finance and the
theory of investment[J].American Economic Review,1958(58),261-297.
[43]Mreton H.Miller.Debt&Taxes.The Journal of Finance,Vol.XXXII,No.2,
May 1977,pp.261~275.
[44]Myers,S.C.,Determinants of corporate borrowing[J].Journal of Financial
Economics5,1977,146-75.
[45]Myers,S.The capital structure puzzle[J].Journal of Finance,1984,
39(3):575-592..
[46]Myers,S.&Majlu,N.Corporate financing and investment decisions when
firms have information that investors do not have[J].Journal of Financial
Economics,1984,13(l):187-221.
[47]Ng,Chee k.,J.K.Smith,R.I.Smith.Evidence on the Determinants of Credit
Terms Used in Interfirm Trade[J].Journal of Finance,1999,(54);1109-1129.
[48]Petersen,M.A.and R.G.Rajan.The Benefits of Lending Relationships:
Evidence from Small Business Data,the Journal of Finance,1994,XLIX,3-37.
[49]Petersen,M.A.and R.G.Rajan.Trade Credit:Theories and Evidence,the
Review of Financial Studies,1997,Vol.10.No 3,661-691.
[50]Piero Sraffa.The Works and Correspondence ofDavid Ricardo:Volume 1[M].
Cambridge:AtThe University Press,1951.
[51]Rajan,R.G.&Zingales,L.What do we known about capital structure?Some
evidence from international data[J].Journal of Finance,1995,(l):1421-1461.
[52]RobertM Bowen,et al,1982,Evidence on The Existence and Determinants of
Inter-Instry Differences in Leverage[J].Financial Management.Winter:
10-20.
[53]Ross.The determination of financial structure:The incentive signaling
approach,Bell Journal of Economics,1977,Vol.8,p23-40.[54]Saring,Oded H...Bargaining with a Corporation and the Capital Structure of
Bargaining Firm[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1984,(17).
[55]Scott,J.H.Bankruptcy,secured debt and optimal capital structure[J].Journal
of Finance,1977,(32):1-19.
[56]Smith,C.W.,andR.L.Watts,The Investment opportunity set and corporate
financing,dividend and compensation Polices[J],Journal of Financial
Economics3,1992,20-27
[57]Stiglitz,J.&Weiss,A.Credit rationing in the market with imperfect
information[J].American Economic Review,1981,73(3):393-409.
[58]Stultz R.Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies[J].Journal
ofFinancialEconomics,1990,(26):3-27.
[59]Taggart,R.A.A model of corporate financing decisions[J].Journal of Finance,
1977,(32):1467-1484.
[60]Taub,A.J.Determinants of the firm』s capital structure[J].Review of Economics
and Statistics,1975,(57):410-416.
[61]Titman,S.The effect of capital structure on a firm,liquidation
decision[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1984,(13):137-151.
[62]Titman,S.&Wessels,R.The determinants of capital structure choice[J].Journal
of Finance,1988,(43):1-19.
[63]Wald,J.K.How firm characteristics affect capital structure:an international
comparison[J]Journal of Financial Research,1999,(22):161-187.
[64]Willamson,O.Corporate finance and corporate governance[J].The Journal of
Finance,1988,43(3):567-591.
[65]William D.Bradford Creating Government Financing Programs for Small and
Medium-sized Enterprises in China[J].2004,234-245.
4. 互聯網金融融資對中小企業的影響
傳統金融行業,只有大中型企業、業績優良或與銀行關系良好等企業或國企能得到銀行貸款,因為一般貸款為抵押貸款,有些銀行抵押貸款都做不完,中小企業因輕資產、建立時間不長、銀行流水不夠漂亮、無可靠信用記錄、風險較高等因素影響,使得這一領域風險相對較高,一般大銀行在貸款不愁發放或有肥肉可盯的情況,都不太願意跟中小企業玩耍。
如果銀行借不到錢,部分小企業可能轉向高利貸,但是小企業本身不具備高利潤率的條件,而且有時候創業風險較大,利率又高,很大程度增加了這部分企業的負擔、業務發展不起來,實際中國中小企業又解決了大部分的就業問題,可是沒有好的發展機會與資金支持,進而導致國民經濟運轉不活躍,普通民眾工資待遇也受到影響,也不能投入更多資金創新、發展技術,所以,更劃算的做法就是代工、山寨、抄襲、低工資、血汗工廠。
而可以輕松貸到款的大型企業實際上也許並不差錢,他們轉手把這些錢以更高利息貸給小企業的話,能成功賺取這部分差價,而小企業算是辛苦為大企業打工。
互聯網金融可以通過更多方式(交易數據、業務量、銀行交易記錄、及其他互聯網痕跡)矯正這種畸形,表面上以高於銀行利率帶給小企業(8%-20%),但比起借高利貸(20%以上)實際上是降低了中小企業的融資成本,促進小企業的發展繁榮,活躍民營經濟在創新、靈活性,在提供就業等方面,做出不小的貢獻。而且,互聯網金融信息的共享與大數據的挖掘,將提高資金流轉效率,盤活更多以前無用的信息和資源,控製得當的話,將促進社會信用體系不斷完善。
5. 怎樣發揮互聯網金融對中小企業融資積極影響
樓主:
傳統金融行業,只有大中型企業、業績優良或與銀行關系良好等企業或國企能得到銀行貸款,因為一般貸款為抵押貸款,有些銀行抵押貸款都做不完,中小企業因輕資產、建立時間不長、銀行流水不夠漂亮、無可靠信用記錄、風險較高等因素影響,使得這一領域風險相對較高,一般大銀行在貸款不愁發放或有肥肉可盯的情況,都不太願意跟中小企業玩耍。
如果銀行借不到錢,部分小企業可能轉向高利貸,但是小企業本身不具備高利潤率的條件,而且有時候創業風險較大,利率又高,很大程度增加了這部分企業的負擔、業務發展不起來,實際中國中小企業又解決了大部分的就業問題,可是沒有好的發展機會與資金支持,進而導致國民經濟運轉不活躍,普通民眾工資待遇也受到影響,也不能投入更多資金創新、發展技術,所以,更劃算的做法就是代工、山寨、抄襲、低工資、血汗工廠。
而可以輕松貸到款的大型企業實際上也許並不差錢,他們轉手把這些錢以更高利息貸給小企業的話,能成功賺取這部分差價,而小企業算是辛苦為大企業打工。
互聯網金融可以通過更多方式(交易數據、業務量、銀行交易記錄、及其他互聯網痕跡)矯正這種畸形,表面上以高於銀行利率帶給小企業(8%-20%),但比起借高利貸(20%以上)實際上是降低了中小企業的融資成本,促進小企業的發展繁榮,活躍民營經濟在創新、靈活性,在提供就業等方面,做出不小的貢獻。而且,互聯網金融信息的共享與大數據的挖掘,將提高資金流轉效率,盤活更多以前無用的信息和資源,控製得當的話,將促進社會信用體系不斷完善。
6. 互聯網金融的典型案例
四大商業銀行推出的網上銀行,騰訊推出的微信聯合人保財險的手機端支付,淘寶聯合天弘基金開發的余額寶,還有包括:易付寶、百付寶、快錢等多家第三方支付平台。
2013年全球私募股權與互聯網金融相關的領域延續了過去幾年的火熱。僅5月份,Twitter宣布收購大數據創業公司Lucky Sort;IDG宣布兩宗與虛擬貨幣相關的投資;微軟擬出資10億美元收購Nook Media公司數字資產。
2014年7月國內某P2P公司完成C輪融資,三年內累計融資金額超6億元。C輪融資主投資方是蘭亭投資,為新加坡主權投資公司淡馬錫子公司。此外,前兩輪投資方光速安振中國基金、紅杉資本、凱鵬華盈中國基金都追加了投資 微金融又稱微信金融 ,是2012年左右新興的一種金融模式。即藉助微信等典型的社交媒體平台,為用戶提供相對理財,投資,貸款等規模較小的金融行為環境,一般情況下,指的是為中小微企業、創業者、個體工商戶、小額投資者等提供的金融服務。日前有第三方平台發布了微信金融平台排名,以其中名列前位的「閃電借款」為例,2015年第三季度財報顯示,其閃電借款平台7、8、9三個月撮合交易額分別有1.95億、2.28億、2.67億,增長極其迅猛。
隨著微金融信息服務體系的不斷壯大,微金融信息服務的概念也在擴大,現在其最為准確的定義是:專門向小型和微型企業及中低收入階層提供的,小額度的、時間短的、可持續循環的微金融產品和服務的活動。」
微金融信息服務的特點有兩點:一是以中小微型企業以及貧困或中低收入群體為特定目標客戶;二是由於客戶有特殊性,它會有適合這樣一些特定目標階層客戶的金融產品和服務。 以規模龐大的線下POS收單市場來說,越來越多的第三方支付企業對線下收單市場的拓展,未來線下支付將給整個綜合支付市場格局帶來重要影響。
7. 中小企業融資難的案例
是的,中小企業融資難是現在普遍的問題,政府也想了很多辦法解決這個問題,可是效果真的不太好,希望中小企業能走出這樣的困境,找到有力的資金支持,發展出自己的一片天地
8. 求國外文獻關於互聯網金融對中小企業融資的影響
去谷歌上問問,谷歌學術